For my second blog post on Roy, I
went through the index and marked every instance of Roy O. Disney being
mentioned in the book. Upon inspection, a number of these had to do with
letters that Walt had written to Roy, which didn’t really give me much insight.
Beyond that however, the text really seemed to give a good picture of who Roy
was in terms of his relationship with Walt and his relationship with the
company.
Roy’s
influence on Walt started extremely early. Elias, Walt’s father, moved the
family from Chicago to an area near Marceline to try his hand at farming in
1906. Walt was only 4 or 5 at the time, so he didn’t have many duties on the
farm, but his older brothers, Ray, Herbert, and Roy had to take on any of the
backbreaking farm work their traditional Christian father laid on them. The
tension between the eldest brothers and their father grew quickly, and when
they became tired of the stranglehold of their father, Ray and Herbert left the
family to make it on their own. From then on, it was just Roy and Walt, and as
the only remaining brothers, they formed a tight bond. (pg 8)
After
the Elias’s farming venture fell through, the family was relocated to Kansas
City. It was here that Elias bought paper routes, forcing his two remaining
sons to serve as little more than indentured servants. The boys did the work of
folding and delivering the papers, while Elias was paid by the paper companies.
The boys “rose every morning around three-thirty” and “attended a full day of
school after this work.” (pg 9)Their working together on this daily project
requiring strenuous physical labor brought the brothers extremely close. It was
after two years of this newspaper delivery work that Roy decided had had enough,
and in 1912 he took his leave from Kansas City.
This event
influences Walt in a few distinct ways. In working closely with Roy, the two
formed a strong connection which would last throughout their professional
careers. This also cemented in Walt a hatred for physical labor. For the rest
of his life, Walt was rarely employed as manual labor, instead working as a
problem solver or in some other creativity driven position. And after this
newspaper job Walt tried his hardest to avoid finances. Elias’s miserly grip on
his family’s funds caused a great rift between family members, playing a large
part in the decision of Herbert and Ray to leave the family. (pg 8) One tale
even suggests Flora, their mother, was look upon as a “heroine” when she would
slide the boys their bread butter-side-down, to hide their butter consumption
from their father. (pg17) The impression Walt got about the negative side of
financing drove him away from the subject, but Roy was able to fill that hole
in Walt’s repertoire, which is why he was so valuable to the company in later
years.
The
next tale of Roy’s influence on Walt I gleamed from just a sentence within a
paragraph recounting an anecdote from their childhood. In this story, Walt,
about 14 at the time, was accused of “insolence” and his father was marching
him and Roy downstairs to be beaten. As they descended the staircase, Roy
whispered to Walt “that he didn’t have to take it anymore.” (pg 20) When Elias
raised his fist to hit Walt, Walt caught his wrists and didn’t let go. Elias
broke down into tears and never struck Walt again.
Although
it only appears for an instant, Roy is seen in one of his first roles as a
supportive brother who would enable and empower Walt. To give Walt the courage
to stand up to their father, Roy must have had great influence on Walt, even at
such an early age. This was one of Roy’s talents, being able to recognize when
Walt was doing the right thing, and to get him to follow through with it.
The
next set of stories also follows this line of thought that Roy was extremely
supportive of his younger brother. When Walt came back from France after World
War 1, he reunited with Roy, who was living in Kansas City. “At Roy’s
suggestion, Walt … applied for work at the Pesmen-Rubin Commercial Art Studio.”
(pg 27) This was Walt’s first official job as an artist. After a shot at
independent work through Walt’s first studio, Laugh-O-Gram Films, which produced
the first Alice Comedies. This fell through, but Walt was determined to make
it, so after talking with Roy, he decided to move to Hollywood. This
combination of events was essentially inspired by Roy. That is to say, that
Walt’s first job as an animator and his move to California may not have occurred
had Roy not supported Walt’s decisions to enter into entertainment.
Roy was
now deeply ingrained in the inner workings of the Disney machine that would
come to be. After Walt had lost Oswald to Charles Mintz and Universal Pictures,
he “held a number of secret, intense brainstorming sessions with Iwerks … and
his brother Roy.” (pg 29) The product of these meetings was Mickey Mouse. After
Mickey gained popularity, there was another debacle over distribution, which was
solved by Walt “huddling with Roy”. (pg 31) In these two instances, Roy became
both a creative entity, which is a role he doesn’t often play, and a negotiations
powerhouse, which is a role he reprises many times throughout his time with
Disney.
I’m
sure there are countless stories about Roy’s prowess as a negotiator and
financier, and I think Watts does a good job of putting the most important ones
in his book. For instance, Roy was the leader of the group that went into
negotiations with the major networks in New York. These negotiations resulted
in Disney’s original partnership with ABC, its first television series,
Disneyland, and the funding to build its first park, also called Disneyland.
(pg 265) Roy also was a driving force within the company regarding integration
and distribution. He is quoted as saying “Integration is a key word around
here: we don’t do anything in one line without giving a thought to its likely
profitability in our other lines.” (pg 372) This statement was made in 1958, and
is most likely referring to the new opportunity within the company to have a
character in three places at once: on the screen, in the consumer’s home, and
at their vacation destination. As far as distribution is concerned, Roy helped
a great deal in convincing the company that it should distribute its own
products. With the establishment of the Buena Vista Film Distribution Company,
Disney was able to cut out the middle man between itself and the consumer. As
Watts put it, “Disney gained nearly complete control over its vast
entertainment process, from production to consumption.” (pg 373)
Roy’s
final show of financial brilliance was during the Walt Disney World fundraising
period. If I understand correctly, Roy sold bonds redeemable for stocks.
Knowing that these deals were underway, the price of Disney stock then rose
well beyond the conversion price for the bonds, which means that they would
make extra money on the bonds. Disney then issued common stocks, at the
increased price, which were bought due to the existing belief of future returns,
making money in three ways in one series of actions. All in all, Disney was
able to pay off $50 million in debt to Bank of America and build the $230
million Florida Project debt-free because of Roy’s strategy. (pg 434)
Roy’s
influence on Walt as an individual was apparent at an early age, and his
influence on Disney as a company was seen more once Walt was an established
animator. Even though each instance of Roy’s presence in Walt’s life plays
toward either company or personal influence, he was always Walt’s brother. When
Walt showed a preview of Snow White to his staff and asked for replies, one of
the cards, secretly written by Roy, read “Walt, stick to shorts!” (pg 426)
Although he was the “quiet, prudent, security-minded steward of studio finances”,
(pg 426) Roy never forgot that Walt was family. Just from reading the limited
passages in Watts’s book, you feel the camaraderie between the two brothers and
come to understand their relationship as one of respect. Hopefully this blog
entry gives similar insight into the brothers’ dynamic.
I'm going to comment just to say that I know my post is overkill.
ReplyDeleteThese are great examples for fleshing out the generalization about the practical roy and the dreamer walt; and this points to a dynamic in any relationship: people are different; successful relations turn those differences into complementary forces rather than antagonistic ones. What kept these two (very different guys) complementary?
ReplyDeleteR not man behind the curtain but the man who made the made the machines that enabled the man in front of the curtain
ReplyDeletethey had a few times of falling out
next time: r-w relation after falling out